The Guardian October 8, 2003
Services for all or tax cuts for the few
by Peter Symon
The revelation that the Federal Government budget has a $7.5 billion tax
surplus shows conclusively that the savage cutbacks that the Howard
Government has made to public health, education and many welfare programs
cannot be justified. The money was there to finance these government
responsibilities. The cutbacks were driven by the Howard Government's
ideological agenda, their hostility to everything that is publicly owned
and that benefits the ordinary working people and their families.
The budget income and expenditure is not audited by any outside body and
the surplus may be much more than has been revealed.
It has not been achieved as a result of "good management" by Howard and
Costello but by the millions of dollars cut from the proportion of
government expenditure going to health and education and other welfare
programs.
Other contributing factors are the imposition of the GST by the Howard
Government that has taken billions from the pockets of mainly working
people. Over $31 billion was collected from the GST in the last financial
year and it has been rising by about $3 billion each year.
Bracket creep
Another factor is "bracket creep" that pushes some wage and salary earners
into more highly taxed brackets. There is a justified argument that tax
brackets should be adjusted to take account of the increase in wage levels
for some categories of workers.
There has been a massive assault on the unemployed, disabled persons, carer
allowances and those receiving other necessary welfare benefits.
The Howard Government is the most destructive of essential services that
Australia has ever had. At the same time it has imposed on working people
the heaviest tax regime of any in the developed industrialised countries.
The statements by Howard and Costello following the announcement of the
budget surplus clearly indicate their cycnical preference for tax
concessions to middle income earners in the hope that this will win their
vote for the present government in the next Federal election.
Priority
The priority must now be established by a massive public demand that the
monies cut from health, education and other social welfare benefits be
restored and that this BE GIVEN PRIORITY over tax cuts to only a few. This
provides benefits to all and particularly to low and middle income earners
to pensioners and other welfare beneficiaries.
The fact that the Government has been forced to suspend the health
insurance levy imposed on doctors as a result of the threatened resignation
of specialist doctors shows that decisive action by sections of the
community can force a retreat by the government.
* The budget surplus must be used to increase the rebate paid to doctors so
that Medicare bulk-billing can be maintained as a service to every member
of the community.
* The free public dental service destroyed by the Howard Government should
be re-established.
* Some of the surplus could be used to re-establish government insurance
offices so that the huge costs imposed on doctors by way of insurance
premiums could be scaled back and contained. The policy of privatisation
should be reversed.
* Millions are available to properly fund universities and to wind back the
new impositions recently forced on the public education system. HECs fees
should be completely abolished. (In the 1970s it was possible to have free
tuition in universities but 30 years later universities are being starved
while huge debts are being forced on students).
* Any government concerned for the Australian people and the future of our
country should reestablish free public education from kindergarten to
university.
Who pays?
A basic question concerning taxation is, who pays? While company tax has
been reduced from 47c in the dollar to its present 30c in the dollar — and
many companies pay much less than this requirement, with some paying no tax
at all — tax paid by working families has gone up, particularly as a
result of the GST.
The CPA remains adamantly opposed to the discriminatory GST. It should be
replaced with a progressive tax system based on earned income, particularly
by tax paid on company profits.
The fact that many families are vastly worse off is revealed in the figures
for household debt which has risen from $290 billion in 1996 (the year the
Howard Government was first elected) to $660 billion now. This situation
demands that the financial policies being pursued by the government are
forcing many more to borrow to keep going. The debt on credit card
borrowings is now substantially over $20 billion — over $1000 for every
man, woman and child in Australia.
Another source of budget income could be that from the profits earned by
publicly owned enterprises. The stupidity of the privatisation of public
enterprises and facilities such as the sale of Qantas, airports, Telstra,
the sell-off of buildings previously owned by governments, is now apparent.
Kenneth Davidson writing in the Melbourne Age writes, ".the
dividends forgone from the sale of half of Telstra are greater than the
interest saved on the retirement of debt. The leaseback arrangements from
the sale of Government property such as the Foreign Affairs headquarters
are far more expensive than the previous situation in which the Government
owned the buildings".
He writes, "an extra billion dollars a year put back into public hospitals
and universities would generate jobs and take pressure off household
debt".
Letters carried in daily newspapers and the response on talk-back radio
indicate that many people do not support tax cuts while allocations to
public services such as health, education and welfare are further attacked
and neglected.
Public pressure demanding that these services be given priority needs to be
built from now until the next election as part of the campaign to
decisively defeat this most conservative and anti-people government that
Australia has ever suffered. Letters to newspapers and participation in
talk-back radio session, writing to your local Federal member and Senator
will all help to build the campaign.
Vital statistics:
Foreign debts has grown from $190 billion when the Howard Government was
elected to $360 billion now.
Commonwealth taxation has increased from 23.5 percent of GDP (1996) to 25.4
percent of GDP in 2003.
Household debt is up from $290 billion in 1996 to $660 billion now.
The Federal Government's GST rip-off increased from $27 billion when first
introduced in 2001 to $341.25 billion in the last financial year.
|